While Indeed is widely used and is sometimes successful in filling medical aesthetics roles, there are numerous negative reviews and criticisms from employers across various industries, including medical aesthetics. These tend to focus on a few common themes:
1. Quality of Applicants
Some employers in the medical aesthetics field have reported receiving a high volume of applicants, but many were not qualified for the specific skills required (e.g., injectables, laser treatments, medical esthetician certifications). This can lead to frustration and time spent filtering through unqualified candidates.
For highly specialized roles in medical aesthetics, it may be harder to find experienced professionals through Indeed compared to niche or industry-specific job boards.
2. High Cost Without Results
Some businesses have expressed concerns about spending a significant budget on job postings or sponsored ads on Indeed but not seeing the desired results in terms of attracting qualified applicants. This can be especially frustrating in competitive fields like medical aesthetics, where skilled professionals are in high demand.
A few users have mentioned that while they received many clicks or views on their job ads, this did not always translate to actual hires.
3. Applicant Tracking Issues
Smaller medical aesthetics clinics or medspas without a dedicated HR department sometimes find Indeed’s applicant tracking system (ATS) cumbersome, reporting issues with keeping track of candidates and communication.
Some reviews also point to difficulty in managing duplicate applications or unresponsive candidates.
4. Poor Customer Support
Some users have mentioned that Indeed's customer service can be slow or unhelpful when addressing issues with job postings, billing concerns, or ad performance.
5. General Job Board Issues
As a generalist job board, Indeed is designed for a wide range of industries. Some medical aesthetics employers feel that the platform is not always the best fit for finding highly specialized professionals, as job-specific platforms or industry-focused networks might yield more relevant candidates.
Why use OnCall instead of Indeed or other big boards to fill open Medical Aesthetics Roles
1. Focus and Specialization
Indeed: Like other generalist job boards, Indeed is used across industries and is designed to serve a wide range of job seekers and employers. While you can find medical aesthetics professionals on Indeed, it's not specifically tailored to the niche, which means more time is spent filtering through unqualified applicants.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting: This platform is specifically focused on medical aesthetics, providing access to a curated pool of professionals with the exact skills needed for roles like aesthetic nurses, cosmetic injectors, medical estheticians, and more. OnCall is designed to connect employers with candidates who are already experienced in the industry, making it highly specialized and efficient.
2. Quality of Candidates
Indeed: While Indeed has a large pool of candidates, it may result in a high volume of general applicants who aren’t specifically trained in medical aesthetics. Employers have to sift through many unqualified applicants to find the right fit.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting: Since OnCall specializes in medical aesthetics, you are much more likely to find highly qualified candidates who have the necessary experience, certifications, and skills specific to the industry. The platform ensures that applicants have direct relevance to the roles being advertised, reducing the time spent filtering through irrelevant candidates.
3. Recruitment Process and Support
Indeed: As a self-service job board, Indeed requires employers to manage the recruitment process themselves. This includes creating job ads, setting budgets, and filtering applications. Indeed offers customer support, but employers often report delays in getting issues resolved.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting: OnCall provides a more hands-on and specialized recruitment service, offering support through the entire hiring process, including pre-screening candidates, matching employers with the right talent, and offering industry-specific recruitment expertise. This makes it a more personalized and tailored experience compared to Indeed’s broader, automated approach.
4. Costs
Indeed: Uses a pay-per-click (PPC) or pay-per-1,000 impressions (CPM) model. The cost per click for medical aesthetics roles on Indeed typically ranges from $1 to $3 per click, depending on the role and market. You can set a daily budget, which usually ranges between $50 to $100 for medical aesthetics positions, but overall costs can add up quickly without guaranteed results.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting: Likely to have slightly higher upfront costs, but these come with specialized recruitment services, such as direct candidate matching, pre-screening, and industry expertise. Employers may pay more than on Indeed, but the value is in the quality of candidates and reduced time-to-hire due to the specialization.
5. Targeting and Efficiency
Indeed: Offers basic targeting features, allowing you to focus on location, experience, and job title. However, it lacks the deep industry knowledge necessary for highly specialized roles, which can result in inefficiencies in finding the right candidates quickly.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting: Built specifically for the medical aesthetics industry, OnCall is highly efficient at targeting and matching roles with qualified professionals. This can be especially useful for roles requiring specific certifications (e.g., Botox or laser technician certifications), reducing the time spent on hiring.
6. Scalability
Indeed: If you're looking to hire for a wide range of positions across various departments (not just medical aesthetics), Indeed’s broad platform offers scalability. It's ideal for employers who are looking to fill both general and specialized roles.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting: While more specialized, OnCall may be better suited for businesses solely focused on medical aesthetics or healthcare practices that frequently need professionals with aesthetic experience. It may not be as scalable for non-industry-specific hiring needs.
7. Reputation in Medical Aesthetics
Indeed: Well-known and widely used across industries, but employers in medical aesthetics report frustration with receiving too many irrelevant applications and needing to invest more time and budget to reach qualified candidates.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting: Has a strong reputation specifically within the medical aesthetics industry for providing high-quality, industry-specific candidates. Its tailored approach means that employers have greater confidence in finding the right talent quickly.
Conclusion
Indeed is a broad, general platform that offers a wide reach, but for medical aesthetics roles, it might require more effort and budget to find qualified candidates. It’s best suited for employers who need a general platform for hiring across different roles.
OnCall Medical Aesthetics Recruiting is a specialized service that focuses exclusively on the medical aesthetics industry, offering a curated pool of candidates and a more efficient hiring process. Though likely to have higher upfront costs, the platform’s focus on quality over quantity makes it ideal for employers in the medical aesthetics sector who want to hire quickly and effectively.
For specialized medical aesthetics roles, OnCall is often the better choice, especially if quality and efficiency are priorities.
Comments